Logo Pondera Online
 
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE WEIGHT
Authority
Q. Fabius Vibul(anus?), Praefectus Urbi
Mint
Denomination
2 Libras = 2 Litras
Material
Basalt
Manufacture
Carved
Shape
Truncated sphere or similar (truncated spheroid, truncated double cone, etc.)
Length
8.30 cm
Width
7.50 cm
Height
5.20 cm
Metrology
Mass (g) Mass (grain) Date of measurement Reference fragmented cleaned reference weight
518.00 - - Berlin Antiquites Collection No No Yes
Iconography
Symbol Technique Direction Position Number Synecdoche
Wear
Corrosion
Handle
No
Suspension hole
No
Recarved mould
No
Recarved weight
No
Intentionally destroyed
No
Archaeological description
Berlin Antiquities Collection : « Linsenförmiges Gewicht aus schwarzem Stein mit lateinischer Inschrift Q FABII VIBVL PRAEF VRB. »
Autopsy
No
INSCRIPTION
Language Technique Legend type
Latin Incised Authority
Fac simile

Q FABII VIBVL PRAEF VRB

Edition
Q(uinti) Fabii Vibul(ani ?) Praef(ecti) Urb(is)
Monogram
ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT
Findspot (region)
Findspot (site)
context
CIRCUMSTANCES OF ACQUISITION
Region
City
Date of first acquisition
Dec. 31, 1827
circumstances
Berlin Antiquities Collection: Erwerbungsdatum: 1827/28 Erwerbung von: Vorbesitzer: Slg. Koller; österreichischer General Franz Freiherr von Koller
(1767 - 1826).
DATING OF THE WEIGHT
Curatorial Section
ROMAN
Time frame
Comments on Chronology
COLLECTION HISTORY
Collection
Name Date of acquisition Inventory number
Berlin Antiquities Collection Dec. 31, 1827 Fr. 935
Bibliography
Reference Page/Column Reference (number) Plate / Figure Comment
Friederichs 1871 210 935 None None
VARIA
Additional comment
This object needs to be considered very carefully, as it raises a number of questions. Firstly, is it a weight? Its shape and material are reminiscent of truncated spheres made of dark stone, but the object seems flatter and almost elliptical. What's more, even if it is damaged, its mass is far removed from any usual denomination. Secondly, is it an 'official' artefact? Although its inscription explicitly mentions a City Prefect, it is incised very crudely. Finally, who is the individual indicated? Only one Q. Fabius Vibulanus, a consul from the 5th century BC. Unfortunately, the archaeological context is not known.
It is therefore tempting to classify it as a fake. However, N. Franken classified it as a weight in the inventory of the Berlin Antikensammlung. Franken's expertise in Roman weighing instruments is well established. Lastly, it would appear to be a very old fake, since the object was acquired by the collection in 1827.
It should therefore be kept among the weights, but a more in-depth study of the case is required.
Permalink
External link