Additional comment
Simone Killen: Michon 1907 mentioned Ephesus as mint, Reinach just mentioned Ephesus, and it´s not clear if as mint or as find spot. There are coins from Ephesus from the 3rd and 2nd century B.C. with quiver and bow and the inscription would match as well: the first two lines ARTE(mis), but we have no idea about the third line.
There are a few more examples with quiver and bow:
- Pernice 1904, p. 45, n. 11 and Winter 1898, col. 42.
- Auction Münz Zentrum 2007b, n. 1009 (without picture): lead, 3,1 x 3,1 x 1,1 cm; 110 g, quiver and bow, inscription?.
- Perk Collection, inv. n. A 1075: lead, 2,8 x 2,9 x 1,0 cm; 76,9 g, quiver and bow, no inscription. Find spot: Cius.
So, my suggestion was that the weights could be from Cius, since the last one was found in Cius and Cius has bow and quiver on coins under Prusias I. But these coins are rare, and Cius minted normally bow and gorytus. And it is not sure if the weight in the National Museum of Denmark (with inscription) is connected with the three others without inscription. But the Perk Collection has a focus on the northern west of Turkey, so maybe it is rather Cius than Ephesus.
And since there is another weight, only with quiver and without bow, but with the inscription Α Ρ | Τ Ε | ΡΞCΚ? (Auction Gorny and Mosch 2008a), it´s possible that the quiver is the main symbol, not the combination of quiver and bow.
See also https://pondera.uclouvain.be/artifact/2202/, https://pondera.uclouvain.be/artifact/13470/, and https://pondera.uclouvain.be/artifact/13906/