Metrology
Mass (g) |
Mass (grain) |
Date of measurement |
Reference |
fragmented |
cleaned |
reference weight |
63.48 |
- |
- |
Wolff and Finkielsztejn 2009 |
No |
No |
Yes |
Iconography
Symbol |
Technique |
Direction |
Position |
Number |
Synecdoche |
Club |
Relief |
|
|
|
|
Palm |
Relief |
|
|
|
|
Sign of Tanit |
Relief |
|
|
|
|
Lattice pattern |
Relief |
|
|
|
|
Handle
Yes
Suspension hole
No
Recarved mould
No
Recarved weight
No
Intentionally destroyed
No
Archaeological description
Elayi and Elayi 1997: Bélière. Droit : Palme, massue dressée et inscription phénicienne G/P M/Š ʾN/L. Revers: signe de Tanit sur fond de croisillons.
Wolff and Finkielsztejn 2009: Dimensions: 3.14 × 3.36 × 0.85 cm. Weight: 63.48 g. Obverse: Frame made of two parallel rounded lines. The inner field is divided in three parts: Palm branch to left, Winged club to right, g m/š ʾ n/l (from right to left). Reverse: Large sign of Tanit on a network of lozenges. No frame. Eran (unpublished report), who was not trained in epigraphy, read these letters as gimel-mem-taw-nun. P. Mosca (personal communication, December 17, 1992) read gimel-mem-aleph-nun, noting that the mem could be read as a šin and that the aleph is missing its lower vertical and may be an intrusion from the cursive series. Lemaire (see Elayi and Elayi 1997:131–132, no. 363) also read gimel-mem-aleph-nun, noting also that the mem could possibly be read as a šin. None of these scholars could propose a convincing meaning for the word gm/šʾn. Note that the first sign is also similar to that representing the number 100, but that does not seem to fit with the other letters.